ST13Fred
Active Member
The valves on all Honda engines hold clearances very well. These engines are so smooth and quiet the auto owners manual say to adjust if they 'sound' noisy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The valves on all Honda engines hold clearances very well. These engines are so smooth and quiet the auto owners manual say to adjust if they 'sound' noisy.
If the comments are limited to Honda cars the advice is 100% accurate. I've owned a handful of Honda cars in 30 years and the maintenance schedules did say to adjust valves at 105,000 miles 'if they are noisy'. Limited to motorcycles however this is bad advice. I generally follow the manual's recommendation which sets the schedule by mileage not decibels.This sounds like very bad advice. Valves mostly need adjusting due to the valve seat wearing (mainly exhaust) which causes the clearance to decrease. They get quiet not noisy. If this continues to where the valve no longer seals at the valve seat you will get a loss of compression, If not corrected the hot gasses will burn out the seat or cause the valve to fail at the neck.
If you have an experienced ear and you don't hear them a bit you should adjust asap.
If they are getting noisy the adjuster could have come loose (never seen this happen) or you have bigger problems associated with not frequent enough oil changes or poor quality oil and you are wearing the cam lobe or rocker face. This is uncommon and not why valve adjustments are part of regular maintenance.
Always adjust the exhaust valves to the loose end of the spec. A little ticking is a comforting sound.
If the comments are limited to Honda cars the advice is 100% accurate. I've owned a handful of Honda cars in 30 years and the maintenance schedules did say to adjust valves at 105,000 miles 'if they are noisy'. Limited to motorcycles however this is bad advice. I generally follow the manual's recommendation which sets the schedule by mileage not decibels.
If the comments are limited to Honda cars the advice is 100% accurate. I've owned a handful of Honda cars in 30 years and the maintenance schedules did say to adjust valves at 105,000 miles 'if they are noisy'. Limited to motorcycles however this is bad advice. I generally follow the manual's recommendation which sets the schedule by mileage not decibels.
I don't think Honda has built a production engine with hydraulic lifters. Honda has been putzing around with chain-driven ohc engines since the late 50s. We've had two CRVs with the B20Z engine, the 2000 was at 260,000 when it met an untimely end against a concrete median, the 1999 is knocking on 200,000 as I type this. It has rocker arms with screw and locknut adjusters not that different from the NC700 engine. Our 1995 Civic coupe had a D series VTEC and was wrecked around 190,000 and the Accord that replaced it was traded at 238,000 still running well. Both of these had similar valve train mechanisms.Hmm wonder if they had hydraulic lifters, only thing that makes sense along with the adjust interval. Certainly not the B2000 engine used widely by Honda in older Civics and crv's. Biggest issue with blown motors on that engine is taking out an exhaust valve.
I don't think Honda has built a production engine with hydraulic lifters. Honda has been putzing around with chain-driven ohc engines since the late 50s. We've had two CRVs with the B20Z engine, the 2000 was at 260,000 when it met an untimely end against a concrete median, the 1999 is knocking on 200,000 as I type this. It has rocker arms with screw and locknut adjusters not that different from the NC700 engine. Our 1995 Civic coupe had a D series VTEC and was wrecked around 190,000 and the Accord that replaced it was traded at 238,000 still running well. Both of these had similar valve train mechanisms.
Hello to all.... I have to totally agree with the earlier post by summitx . Indeed valve clearences usually tighten up (valve noise gets quieter) as the engine is run due to valve seat wear. This is especially true in motorcycle engines due to the increased RPM operating range as compared to let's say a passenger car. These days, cars (due to transmission shift points tuned for fuel economy) seldom see more than 3500 RPM at any given moment. So for my recently purchased NC700X with about 9500 miles on it , I will be inspecting/adjusting the valve lash ASAP. It sounds a bit "too quiet" for my taste. I would bet a 6 pack and a pizza pie that there will be some tight clearances found on my NC700X. I again agree with a an earlier comment that a "slight" tick from the valves is a sound of comfort, at least for me it is for sure. Just my 2 cents for what ever it's worth. Thanks to all
Yes however the NC700X is an exception to the general rule of motorcycle engines which normally produce more horsepower per liter than car or truck engines. At 76 hp/liter the NC engine still produces more power per displacement than many car or truck engines. My Miata has 10 hp less per liter. They [motorcycle engines] are also smaller and more lightly built with bearings and bushing surfaces under more load per surface area and the operators often are shifting up and down through the rev range far more often than a car or truck. All aluminum blocks and heads came into common MC engine use over 50 years ago while a relatively new development in car engines and still relatively rare in large truck engines.I don't disagree with your thoughts on valve clearances tightening up. But, red line on my NC700 is the same as on all my cars and trucks, give or take a few hundred rpm. It's not stressed or rev'd any more than my car and truck engines.
Yes however the NC700X is an exception to the general rule of motorcycle engines which normally produce more horsepower per liter than car or truck engines. At 76 hp/liter the NC engine still produces more power per displacement than many car or truck engines.
Well, the NC engine isn't a very good example of motorcycle power/displacement as it is designed primarily for efficiency. A Honda 600 sport bike makes about 135 hp or 225 hp/liter. The CB500X makes 118 hp/liter. Anyway, the point is that generally speaking motorcycle engines are more stressed than car and truck engines.Interesting. That got me thinking, so I did some math. As for hp/liter, my pickup truck (80), my minivan (81), and my subcompact car (75) all have a comparable rated hp/liter than the 76 that you stated for the NC700.
Yep, the minivan wins the performance war. They are so under appreciated.
And hey, look at some of the examples of two-stroke snowmobile engines -- incredible power to weight for machines that are not specifically designed for racing.
Thread drift catches me again! Drat!Yes, but this is a valve thread. Adding rotary valves, reed valves, and guillotine power valves to the discussion.
Well, the NC engine isn't a very good example of motorcycle power/displacement as it is designed primarily for efficiency. A Honda 600 sport bike makes about 135 hp or 225 hp/liter. The CB500X makes 118 hp/liter. Anyway, the point is that generally speaking motorcycle engines are more stressed than car and truck engines.
And I'm saying it is but I get your drift. You accelerate to 45 as slowly as possible then stay there. Low stress, low revs, I get that. Most motorcycles, even the NC700X, aren't ridden like that.True, but since this is an NC700/750 forum and we're talking about NC700 valve adjustments, I guess it doesn't matter how stressed the other bike's engines might be. All I was trying to say is, in response to post #31, is that the NC is not necessarily stressed or revved more than typical car engines.