• A few people have been scammed on the site, Only use paypal to pay for items for sale by other members. If they will not use paypal, its likely a scam NEVER SEND E-TRANSFERS OF ANY KIND.

Which Saves More Gas – Cars or Motorcycles?

admin

Staff member
Joined
Nov 11, 2011
Messages
7,287
Reaction score
228
Points
63
Location
Canada
Visit site
When I first swung a leg over a motorcycle, I’ll admit I had no clue what I was doing.

Sure, everybody riding had introduced the concept of motorcycles to me as ‘a bike but faster’…but the real perk came when I could ride for a handful of hours and refill for under $15 CAD (just under $12 USD).

Of course, this knowledge fuelled the occasional Google search into the gas-guzzling specs of two wheels versus the perks of the increasingly efficient four-wheeled sibling.

So which machine boasts better bang for buck? Have automobiles caught up to bikes when it comes to best bang for buck?

A motorcyclist in his....less natural environment. Media sourced from 5FourMotorcycles.
A motorcyclist in his….less natural environment. Media sourced from 5FourMotorcycles.

RideApart has found a test from Motorrad exploring three categories and pitting the following machines against each other:

Sport: Yamaha YZF-R1 vs. Porsche 718 Cayman​

Economy: Honda NC 750 vs. Ford Focus​

Utility: BMW R 1250 GS vs. Audi Q5 Sport Back 45 TFSI Quattro​


Can you guess the results?

A Porsche 718 Cayman. Media sourced from Top Gear and Crossroads Yamaha.
A Porsche 718 Cayman. Media sourced from Top Gear and Crossroads Yamaha.

SPORT​

Yamaha YZF-R1


Claimed: 33mpg

Test Result: 41mpg

Porsche 718 Cayman


Claimed: 27mpg (highway)

Test Result: 24mpg

A Honda NC 750 with a Ford Focus.  Media sourced from MCN and Top Gear.
A Honda NC 750 with a Ford Focus. Media sourced from MCN and Top Gear.

ECONOMY​

Honda NC 750


Claimed: 80.5mpg
Test Result: 67mpg

Ford Focus


Claimed: 40 mpg (highway)

Test Result: 31mpg

A BMW R 1250 GS with a Audi Q5 Sport Back 45 TFSI Quattro. Media sourced from BMW and Edmunds.
A BMW R 1250 GS with a Audi Q5 Sport Back 45 TFSI Quattro. Media sourced from BMW and Edmunds.

UTILITY​

BMW R 1250 GS


Claimed: 50mpg

Test Result: 52 mpg

Audi Q5 Sport Back 45 TFSI Quattro


Claimed: 25 mpg

Test Result: 22mpg

The real bits and bobs I’m taking away from this whole thing is the spec difference – specifically, who over-performed and who under-performed.

Several cars next to a handful of motorcyclists. Media sourced from RideApart.
Several cars next to a handful of motorcyclists. Media sourced from RideApart.

(For those of you dubious as to the numbers, we’re told that this particular test had a set of rules which the Motorrad marque adhered to very strictly, ‘forcing each similarly-sized driver/rider to adhere to posted speed limits.’)

What do you think? Drop a comment down below, be sure to subscribe to that newsletter pop-up for the best of the latest twice-weekly, and as ever – stay safe on the twisties.

*Media sourced from RideApart, MCN, Crossroads Yamaha, Top Gear, 5FourMotorcycles, and BMW*​


The post Which Saves More Gas – Cars or Motorcycles? appeared first on webBikeWorld.

Continue reading...
 
I think cars are ahead of motorcycles in efficiency, for what they can do. But, in reality this is an apples to oranges comparison. In the case of the Focus vs NC750, why would you compare a vehicle that can carry 4 to 5 people, and probably 500 pounds of luggage, in weather protected, climate controlled, crash protected cabin, to an open air 2 wheeler with a total load capacity of only 430 pounds , and no weather protection, no climate control, and no crash protection?

If you were to compare a dump truck to a car, yes, the car is more efficient, but the car can’t haul 8 yards of dirt.
 
The article was a little silly. Even just comparing the engines size. The larger engine on the heavier vehicle was less efficient...shocking. I was impressed with the BMW R1250GS. I wouldn't expect fuel economy to be that good so that was a surprise to me.
 
Back
Top